Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05442
Original file (BC 2013 05442.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05442

	XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 28 Aug 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a medical condition that occurred during the contested FA, which precluded him from obtaining a satisfactory overall rating.

The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation.  

He misunderstood what signing the FA score sheet meant. 
 
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 28 Aug 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory composite score.

IAW AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13, states any military member can appeal their FA through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error/injustice.

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, if an airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the unit commander within five days of the assessment.  If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the unit commander may invalidate the test results.  The airman will then be required to retest within five duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider and the Exercise Physiologist (EP).

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for void/removal of FA dated 28 Aug 13. Specifically, the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of military records. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 Feb 14 for redirection (Exhibit C). 

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1. The application was timely filed.

2. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force.  As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction.  The Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this application and indicated there is an available avenue of administrative relief the applicant has not first pursued.  In view of this, we find this application is not ripe for adjudication at this level, as there exists a subordinate level of appeal that has not first been depleted.  Therefore, in view of the above, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05442 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXXX, Chair
	XXXXX, Vice Chair
	XXXXX, Member


The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2013-05442 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Nov 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 15 Jan 14.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Feb 14.




                                   XXXXX
                                   Chair





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05144

    Original file (BC 2013 05144 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05144 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 18 Jul 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01625

    Original file (BC 2013 01625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to the applicable regulation in regards to the date of the test, AFI 36-2905, members with a composite score <75 are considered “Unsatisfactory.” The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 7 Jun 2013 94.90 Excellent *11 Mar 13 74.30 Unsatisfactory 10 Dec 12 74.00 Unsatisfactory 28 Jun 12 85.90 Satisfactory 15 Dec 11 87.50 Satisfactory *Annotates Contested FA On 13 Mar 13, an AF FM 108 was signed by the applicants medical provider. On 16 Jan...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05191

    Original file (BC 2013 05191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Feb 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00091

    Original file (BC 2013 00091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her appeal the applicant submits medical documentation and a medical determination letter signed by her medical provider indicating that she did in fact have a medical condition that precluded her from passing the contested FAs. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. In view of this and since...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05060

    Original file (BC 2013 05060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation dated 18 Oct 13. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05080

    Original file (BC 2013 05080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05080 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 28 Oct 09 and 19 Jan 10 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. In view of this and since...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02012

    Original file (BC 2014 02012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a “Medical Determination Letter,” signed by his medical provider, which stated that, “he had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test.” The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 2013, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01997

    Original file (BC 2014 01997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. Furthermore, the Board cannot grant reconsideration on this portion of his request unless...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01677

    Original file (BC 2014 01677.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Examiner’s Note: In his application the member states that he submits a memorandum from his medical provider and a letter from his commander. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the removal of the contested FA due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. Furthermore, the Board cannot grant reconsideration on this portion of his request unless and until he has exhausted all other avenues of relief.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02523

    Original file (BC 2014 02523.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a “Medical Determination Letter,” signed by his medical provider and indicating he had a condition that precluded him from passing the FAs dated 4 Jun 12 and 23 Aug 12 and a commander invalidation memorandum, requesting that the FA dated 30 May 13 be removed. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. ...